Protecting Our Firm and Safeguarding the Interests of Our Clients
Perkins Coie’s response to the unlawful Executive Order targeting the firm
A Message From Our Managing Partner
On March 11, 2025, we filed a legal action in response to a recent Executive Order that unlawfully targets Perkins Coie. The order violates core constitutional rights, including the rights to free speech and due process. At the heart of the order is an unlawful attack on the freedom of all Americans to select counsel of their choice without fear of retribution or punishment from the government. We were compelled to take this action to protect our firm and our clients.
Since our founding in 1912, Perkins Coie has built enduring relationships with our clients based on trust, dedication, and a shared pursuit of excellence. We have advocated for clients with a wide range of perspectives, beliefs, and needs. We take pride in a workplace culture grounded in a commitment to treating everyone, regardless of background, with fairness, civility, and respect. We are a firm of more than 2,400 people proudly working together across 21 offices in service to our clients. We represent clients from start-ups to market leaders across a wide range of industries and practice areas. We are known for representing some of the world’s most innovative companies on issues at the forefront of technological change.
We are grateful for the outpouring of support and offers of assistance following the issuance of last Thursday’s Executive Order. I have never been prouder to stand with my firm and others in the legal community in support of our people, our clients, and our profession.

Bill Malley
Managing Partner
Statements
March 12, 2025
Today’s decision granting our motion for a temporary restraining order is an important first step in ensuring this unconstitutional Executive Order is never enforced. We will follow the court’s direction regarding next steps and will continue to challenge the Executive Order, which threatens our firm, our clients, and core constitutional protections important to all Americans.
March 11, 2025
Today, we filed a legal action to prevent enforcement of an unlawful Executive Order targeting our firm. The order violates core constitutional protections, including the rights to free speech and due process, and undermines all clients’ right to select counsel of their choice. We were compelled to take this step to protect our firm and safeguard the interests of our clients.
Filings
Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
Coalition of State Attorneys General Amicus Brief
Key Excerpts
- The President’s Executive Order challenged here presents dangerous incentives to lawyers to quiet their voices, limit their arguments, or forgo the legal process at all.
- The principle that every person deserves competent legal representation is nonpartisan, longstanding, and fundamental to the rule of law.
- The Executive Order repudiates the time-honored tradition that, as lawyers across the political spectrum have recognized, the justice system functions best when there is zealous, high-quality advocacy on all sides.
- While our positions in litigation may differ, the states, the courts, and the public all benefit when all sides to a dispute are effectively represented.
Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice – Complaint
Key Excerpts
- The [Executive] Order is an affront to the Constitution and our adversarial system of justice. Its plain purpose is to bully those who advocate points of view that the President perceives as adverse to the views of his Administration.
- The firm is comprised of lawyers who advocate for clients; its attorneys and employees are not activists or partisans. But Perkins Coie's ability to represent the interests of its clients—and its ability to operate as a legal-services business at all—are under direct and imminent threat.
- Perkins Coie cannot allow its clients to be bullied.
- The firm is committed to a resolute defense of the rule of law, without regard to party or ideology.
Plaintiff Perkins Coie LLP’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff Perkins Coie’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
Key Excerpts
- Perkins Coie lawyers . . . practice at the highest levels of the profession in federal and state courts across the country, before more than 90 federal agencies, and in varied transactional settings. They serve their communities as Sunday school teachers, Scout leaders, youth sports coaches, military reservists, and board members of civic organizations.
- Lawyers protect and promote our cherished freedoms, including the rights to free speech and to petition the government, and safeguard the rule of law that underpins our democratic system.
- Critical to this role is lawyers’ time-honored duty to advocate zealously for their clients, no matter how controversial. Zealous advocacy serves as a bulwark against government abuses that erode the rule of law.
- In keeping with the highest tradition of the legal profession, Perkins Coie has zealously advocated for its clients in matters large and small since the Firm’s founding more than a century ago. The President’s Executive Order attacks Perkins Coie and its clients for that advocacy. The Firm already has suffered significant harm, and that harm is increasing every day.
- Although the Executive Order is expressly political, its consequences are not. The Order already has produced several harmful effects for Perkins Coie and its clients. Government officials already have invoked the Order to refuse to meet with Perkins Coie attorneys—including on matters having nothing to do with presidential politics or government contracting. Agencies already have asked Perkins Coie clients to disclose whether they have a relationship with the Firm. Some clients already have chosen to move work elsewhere. And other clients have expressed grave concern about the consequences of continuing to retain Perkins Coie if this illegal Order is not enjoined.
Declaration of Professor Roy D. Simon, Jr. in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
Roy Simon is the Howard Lichtenstein Distinguished Professor of Legal Ethics at Hofstra University School of Law and the director of Hofstra's Institute for the Study of Legal Ethics.
Key Excerpts
- The Executive Order directed at Perkins Coie and its lawyers, if allowed to stand, will undermine fundamental principles of the system of justice in the United States.
- Law firms will be less likely to represent clients that the President or his allies and supporters view with disfavor or clients that are unpopular with the President’s base.
- Clients (especially clients not aligned with the President) are likely to have a narrower choice of counsel and to have greater difficulty finding counsel.
Declaration of Robert E. Hirshon in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
Robert E. Hirshon is a former president of the American Bar Association who, until his retirement last year, was the Frank G. Millard Professor from Practice and Special Counsel on Developments in the Legal Profession at the University of Michigan Law School.
Key Excerpts
- [T]he Executive Order will be understood by lawyers and law firms as an extreme, dangerous, and unprecedented effort to intimidate them and prevent them from representing clients whom the President does not wish to have legal counsel.
- If implemented, the Executive Order will have the effect of preventing lawyers from performing their required role in our democracy, and it will inflict grievous harm on the administration of justice in the United States.
Declaration of David J. Burman in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
David J. Burman is partner at Perkins Coie LLP. He has been an attorney at Perkins Coie for over 45 years, following two years clerking, and serves on the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Key Excerpts
- Perkins Coie’s attorneys are drawn from all sides of the political spectrum, and most of our attorneys are not politically active. There are attorneys who are liberal and attorneys who are conservative.
- Many of our attorneys joined the firm after government service under both Democratic and Republican administrations, or after serving as judges or judicial law clerks to judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents. Reflecting this bipartisan ethos, in recent years, four Perkins Coie partners have been nominated and confirmed to serve as federal judges – two by President Trump in 2019, and two by President Biden in 2021 and 2023.
- Perkins Coie is dedicated to our clients, our communities, and each other. The firm has a longstanding, firmwide commitment to pro bono service. Since 1989, the firm has provided approximately 1.45 million hours of pro bono service to innumerable clients, including veterans, indigent families, disabled persons, and community-based organizations of all sizes.
Declaration of Professor Bruce A. Green in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
Bruce A. Green is the Louis Stein Chair at Fordham Law School, where he directs the Louis Stein Center for Law and Ethics.
Key Excerpts
- The Executive Order is inconsistent with, and interferes with, settled understandings of the separation of powers and, in particular, judicial regulation of the legal profession.
- Professional conduct rules recognize that a lawyer must “represent a client zealously and diligently within the bounds of the law,” D.C. Rules Rule 1.3(a)…. The Executive Order will interfere with this fundamental obligation of lawyers because it will chill Perkins Coie and other law firms from representing clients zealously and diligently, for fear of being branded pariahs by the federal government.
- This form of regulation by presidential whim… threatens to undermine the judicial regulation that requires lawyers to represent clients zealously and not to subordinate clients’ interests to and lawyers’ own self-interest.
Editorials & Commentary
Resources & Materials
The Bar Association of San Francisco Stands with the Lawyers and Law Firms Targeted by the Trump Administration
Cleveland Metro Bar Condemns Executive Order Attacking Perkins Coie LLP; Cites Dangerous Chilling Effect on Attorneys and Clients
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser Joins Coalition of States in Filing a Court Brief in Support of Law Firm Targeted by Trump
California Attorney General Bonta in Brief Supporting Perkins Coie: President Trump’s Latest Action Chills Free Speech, Undermines Rule of Law
Washington State Attorney General’s Office Joins Coalition of States Filing an Amicus Brief in Support of Perkins Coie
Vermont Attorney General Clark Files Amicus Brief to Support Lawsuit Over Trump Administration’s Attack on Law Firm
Los Angeles County Bar Association Condemns Recent Attacks on the Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession
New York State Bar Association Condemns Executive Orders Punishing Lawyers for Representing Causes the Trump Administration Doesn’t Like
The Executive Orders attacking lawyers and law firms for doing their jobs – which include representing any cause the president doesn’t like — threaten to upend a bedrock principle of the American legal system.